Legal Opinion
B. F. & C. M. Davis Co. v. W. E. Callaghan Const. Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided October 5, 1927No. 760-4725PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.
The nature and result’ of this case have been accurately stated by the Court of Civil Appeals. See 283 S. W. 1098. We shall not restate the case herej except so far as may he necessary to an understanding of the issues raised in the various applications, all three of which were granted by the Supreme Court. The Wichita county water improvement district No. 1 entered into a contract with the Callaghan Construction Company to erect dams and a general irrigation plant. The construction company, with the consent of the improvement district, sublet much of its work to the Davis Company. The…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Keokee Consolidated Coke Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Salt Lake City v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Knox Recr. v. BallTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Adams v. American Quarter Horse Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Mundy v. Knutson Construction CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Knox, Recr.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
- Winder Brothers v. R. S. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.