Legal Opinion
Schevenell v. Blackwood
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 27, 1929No. 8441PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
The appellant — plaintiff in the court below — a resident of Tennessee, brought this suit against the appellees as defendants, the officers of the state of Arkansas constituting the highway commission of that state, attacking the constitutionality of certain of the laws of Arkansas relating to the construction and maintenance of state highways, under which the defendants have acted. Arkansas has adoptr ed the method now used by many, if not most, of the states of the Union, of establishing, constructing, and maintaining a system of state highways out of revenues…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
- Saltonstall v. SaltonstallSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Crampton v. ZabriskieSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Stebbins v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Bush v. MartineauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Oakdell, Inc. v. GallardoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.