Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,812 Sarame Raynolds Strong v. William H. G. France and the National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. ("Nascar")
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1973No. 71-1440PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge:
This is an appeal from a final judgment, entered pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, dismissing the complaint of plaintiff-appellant, Sarame Raynolds Strong, as against the defendants-appellees, William H. G. France and the National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. (NASCAR), following an order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c). 1
The complaint alleges violations of federal securities laws 2 stemming from an enterprise involving the creation of a corporation, Sportscaster, Incorporated, for the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,351 Billie Jean Woodward v. Metro Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Burgess v. Premier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,567 Edmond G. Pharo v. W. L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,722 Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Seaboard Corporation, Etc., Admiralty Fund and Admiralty Fund Growth Series Litigation Trust, Cross-Claimant/appellant v. Hugh Johnson & Company, Inc., Hugh Johnson, Norman Michael Keiser, and Ernst& Ernst, Cross-Defendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.