Maghen v. Quicken Loans Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge
The matter before the Court is Defendant Quicken Loans Inc.’ motion for sum*1143mary judgment, filed on March 27, 2015. [Doc. # 35.] Plaintiff Justin Maghen filed an opposition on April 3, 2015. [Doc. # 43.] Quicken filed a reply on April 10, 2015. [Doc. # 45.] A hearing on the motion was held on April 24, 2015.
Having duly considered the parties’ written submissions and oral argument, the Court now renders its decision.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Court sets forth the uncon-troverted material…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- CS Wang & Assoc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Rojas v. HSBC Card Services Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2023