Legal Opinion
Citibank, N.A. v. Automart International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 21, 2014No. Case No. 14 C 169Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RONALD A. GUZMÁN, District Judge.
For the reasons stated below, Citibank’s motion for summary judgment as to Auto-mart and Bee June Cheng [52] is granted.
STATEMENT
Citibank moves for summary judgment against defendants/third-party plaintiffs Automart International, Inc. and Bee June Cheng (collectively, “Defendants”) as to Counts I (breach of note and loan agreement against Automart) and III (breach of guaranty against Bee June) of the complaint. Automart concedes it has no defense to Count I and agrees that judgment should be granted in Citibank’s favor as to that count.
Facts
Defendants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michael B. Smith v. Douglas Lamz and the Village of Algonquin, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Gonzalez v. City of ElginCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Lloyd Sarver v. Experian Information SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Weber v. Universities Research Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.