Legal Opinion

Celotex Corp. v. Tate

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 27, 1990No. 13-89-444-CVPublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEYS, Justice.

Appeal is taken from the jury trial of a toxic tort case. Appellees, the heirs of James Tate’s estate, brought suit against defendants Union Carbide, George Rowley, Inc., Celotex Corp. and others. Appellees alleged that each of the defendants sold or supplied raw asbestos to Tate’s employer and that the defendants’ failure to warn of the dangers involved in handling asbestos resulted in Tate’s unsafe exposure, proximately causing his death. Before trial, all defendants, except the three mentioned above, were released by appellees. During trial, Union Carbide settled for…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Claude Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Asbestos Corporation LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. C.M. Asfahl Agency v. Tensor Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  3. Fibreboard Corp. v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Atkinson Gas Co. v. Albrecht, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  5. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. Tucker, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API