Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Metokote Corp., 1-07-54 (7-7-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 2008No. 1-07-54Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} The plaintiffs-appellants, Gerry Quinn and Candy Quinn, appeal the judgment of the Allen County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment to the defendant-appellee, MetoKote Corporation. On appeal, Quinn contends there are genuine issues of material fact, which render summary judgment inappropriate. For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

{¶ 2} MetoKote is in the business of coating metal parts for various customers, with facilities located across North America, including one in Lima, Ohio. In Building 3 of the Lima facility, MetoKote runs…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API