Legal Opinion

Wakefield, Fries & Co. v. Sherman, Clay & Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an action to recover on quantum meruit for services alleged to have been performed by plaintiff as a real estate broker. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and defendant appeals from the judgment. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, defendant moved for a nonsuit. The motion was denied and the correctness of this ruling is the main question for decision. •

According to plaintiff’s testimony, on February 28, 1929, the defendant, a California corporation, was occupying a building in which it was conducting a store on the corner of Sixth and Morrison streets in the city of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leach & Co. v. PeirsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Learned v. . TillotsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Seevers v. Cleveland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. Ross v. ReynoldsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  5. De Vol v. Citizens BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Menefee v. BlitzOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Shaver Forwarding Co. v. Eagle Star InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Harder v. HastorfOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. In Re Richter's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Richter v. RitchieOregon Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API