Wakefield, Fries & Co. v. Sherman, Clay & Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
This is an action to recover on quantum meruit for services alleged to have been performed by plaintiff as a real estate broker. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and defendant appeals from the judgment. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, defendant moved for a nonsuit. The motion was denied and the correctness of this ruling is the main question for decision. •
According to plaintiff’s testimony, on February 28, 1929, the defendant, a California corporation, was occupying a building in which it was conducting a store on the corner of Sixth and Morrison streets in the city of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leach & Co. v. PeirsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Learned v. . TillotsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Seevers v. Cleveland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Ross v. ReynoldsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
- De Vol v. Citizens BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Menefee v. BlitzOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Shaver Forwarding Co. v. Eagle Star InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Harder v. HastorfOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re Richter's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Richter v. RitchieOregon Supreme Court · 1947