Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Browning

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 31, 2000No. 99-0417/ARPublished

1ConcurrenceSullivan, Judge

I agree that the lower appellate court’s decision should be affirmed. However, I have some difficulty with the majority’s joint treatment of the distinct legal issues in this case. I prefer a more direct analysis of the issues.

With respect to Issue I, I find no error because the evidence was properly admitted under Mil.R.Evid. 404(b) and because the probative value of this evidence was not substantially outweighed by any unfair prejudice under Mil.R.Evid. 403. See United States v. Smith, 52 MJ 337 (2000); see generally E. Imwinkelried, Uncharged Misconduct Evidence § 2:05 (1999). With respect…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Rayful Edmond, IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. David MonahanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Zulema Gonzalez, Patricia Delgado, Francisco Jose ArguelloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API