Legal Opinion

DeWeese v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided November 13, 2000No. IP99-1064-C-B/SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BARKER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Suzanne DeWeese (“DeW-eese”), alleges that Defendant, Daim-lerChrysler Corporation (“Daimler-Chrysler”), 1 discriminated against her by refusing to hire her because of her age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (Count I), and because of her race, in violation of both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000 et seq. (Count II), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Count III). Defendant responds that DeWeese…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Am. Homeland Title Agency, Inc. v. RobertsonDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2018
  2. Groves v. South Bend Community School CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API