New York Life Insurance v. Rose
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
This is an action in interpleader wherein plaintiff, New York Life Insurance Company, required the two defendants to litigate their respective claims to the proceeds of a certain policy of life insurance issued to Joe L. Rose. The insurance company deposited the proceeds of the policy, less certain expenses, and was discharged. The trial was had upon the cross-complaint of Mary S. Rose and the answer thereto filed by Tony S. Rose. Judgment went to Mary S. Rose, from which Tony S. Rose appeals under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The facts of the case as found by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Freund v. FreundIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Supreme Conclave v. CappellaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1890
- Jory v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Marsh v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Quist v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnston v. KearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. GeboSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Novosel v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Travelers Insurance v. GeboSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934