Legal Opinion

Humphreys v. State ex rel. Guste

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1979No. 9868PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEER, Judge.

On January 27, 1978, the State Attorney General’s office served investigative demands upon appellee, Malcolm W. Hum-phreys, the franchisee of two Arthur Murray Dance Studios, located at 1515 St. Charles Avenue and 3511 Hessmer Avenue. The demands alleged that Humphreys’ “methods of competition and the acts and practices employed with respect thereto may constitute commercial activity declared unlawful by the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law as set forth in Louisiana Revised Statutes 51:1405,1 (et *252seq.) and other state and federal statutory laws, and/or rules and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Steele v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. United States v. W. F. Reno, A/K/A Bill RenoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  5. People Ex Rel. MacFarlane v. American Banco Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Humphreys v. State ex rel. GusteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Humphreys v. State ex rel. GusteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API