Legal Opinion

United States v. Eric Scurry

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 8, 2016No. 12-3104, 12-3105, 12-3109, 13-3055, 13-3068PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

The principal question presented in this appeal is whether Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 mandates suppression of evidence derived from a wiretap where information expressly required by the statute was omitted from the court order authorizing the wiretap. Appellants contend that the district court erred in. denying their motions to suppress, relying on our subsequent decision in United States v. Glover, 736 F.3d 509 (D.C.Cir.2013). In Glover, 736 F.3d at 513-14, the court‘reiterated…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. Henry WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Ernest GloverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. ApodacaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Joey BrunsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  5. Arevalo v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API