Long Sault Development Co. v. Call
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clarke
This proceeding was commenced in the Supreme Court of New York by the Long Sault Development Company, hereinafter called the plaintiff, for the purpose of testing the constitutionality of an act of the legislature of that State, passed in 1907, to incorporate the plaintiff and to grant to it important rights in the bed of, and with respect to the use of the waters of, the St. Lawrence River. (Laws of 1907, c. 355.)
The case is now in this court on the claim that this Act of 1907 is a valid law and that the property rights, springing from the grants therein and the acceptance of them by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Defiance Water Co. v. DefianceSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- New Orleans v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Morris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Appleby v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Denihan Enterprises, Inc. v. O'DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Fox River Paper Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.