Legal Opinion

Hazeltine Corp. v. R. E. B. Service Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 10, 1934No. 7163PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This action is brought for relief by injunction and money damages, for the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,879,863, issued to Harold A. Wheeler, assignor to Hazeltine Corporation, for volume control, granted September 27, 1932. Original application filed *101July 7, 1927, serial No. 203,879, and in Great Britain July 3,1928. Divided and this application filed November 13, 1930, serial No. 495,386.

This suit is based on claims 1, 5, 6, and 10 of the patent in suit.

The plaintiff, Hazeltine Corporation, is not a manufacturer, but is the owner of a number of patents, of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. National Electric Signaling Co. v. Telefunken Wireless Telegeaph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1913
  5. Duplex Electric Co. v. Padua Holdup Alarm Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API