Legal Opinion

Fulwider v. Benda

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1934No. File No. 7646PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff, having sued the defendant upon money demand, procured the levy of an attachment upon certain of defendant’s property. Subsequently, on, defendant’s motion, an order was made in the court below dissolving the attachment, from which order plaintiff has appealed.

No procedural defects are claimed, and the entire controversy between the parties is as to whether or not the record shows sufficient grounds to justify the issuance of the attachment. The entire matter having been presented below upon affidavits, there is no presumption in favor of the determination of the learned trial judge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. HartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Guaranty State Bank v. VarlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Royal Union Life Ins. v. BoyntonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Piper v. WadeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Automobile Casualty Underwriters v. RuotsalainenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Credit Management Service, Inc. v. WendbourneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Foltz v. Warner TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Quality Builders, Inc. v. HahnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Foltz v. Warner TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API