Smith v. Hart
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
‘This action was brought to- enforce defendant’s liability under 'Const., art. 18, § 3, and section 8937, Coda 1919, as stockholder in the failed Dakota State Bank of Salem. Garnishment process was served upon the garnishee Struck, who disclosed in response thereto that she had under her control the sum of $4,000 payable to defendant on a contract whereby she was purchasing from the defendant his homestead in Salem. It appears that the homestead property had a total- value of $4,500; the sum of $500 having -been previously paid by the garnishee to the defendant as part of the purchase price…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fairmont & Veblen Railway Co. v. BethkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Jensen v. GriffinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by11 opinions
- Orange Brevard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. La CroixSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Fleischhauer v. BILSTAD, GRAY ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- First Nat. Bank of Biwabik, MN v. Bank of LemmonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Credit Management Service, Inc. v. WendbourneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Schuler v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.