Legal Opinion

Guaranty State Bank v. Varland

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1926No. File No. 5313PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURCH, C.

Plaintiff commenced an action upon a promissory note not due to recover $340 and interest. A warrant of attachment was issued, and levy made thereunder, upon an affidavit stating as grounds therefor “that the defendant is about to sell, transfer, and dispose of all his personal property, with ‘intent do cheat, defraud, and delay the plaintiff.’ ”

On motion to vacate said attachment hearing was had, and the .circuit court denied the motion, and from the order denying the motion to vacate the attachment this appeal is trken.

Defendant denied the grounds of attachment, thereby placing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trebilcock v. Big Missouri Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wyman v. WilmarthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Wilcox v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Park v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank of Hecla v. MichaelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fulwider v. BendaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Quality Builders, Inc. v. HahnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Smith v. Varel Manufacturing CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API