Mickleson v. Helm

This appeal involves two actions instituted in the district court of Tuls.a county; one by Cyrus Helm, plaintiff, against D. D. Mickleson, defendant, to recover $1,542.12 and interest, and one by J. E. Templeton, plaintiff, against D. D. Mickleson, defendant, to recover $1,568.43 and interest. The cases were consolidated and tried together by the court, without a jury, and at the conclusion of the introduc-. tion of the testimony by the plaintiffs the trial court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiffs’ evidence.

The cases were appealed to this court, and in an opinion filed on November 20,…