Legal Opinion

State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Carlson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2008No. S-11677PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

To what extent may Alaska charge nonresident commercial fishermen higher license and permit fees than it charges residents? In order to comply with the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution, the differential between individual resident and nonresident permit fees must be substantially equal—but need not be precisely equal—to the contribution of each Alaska resident to fisheries management. Because in ordering the state to pay refunds to nonresidents who paid more than their fair contribution to Alaska’s fisheries budget the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Wyoming v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burton v. Fountainhead Development, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. STATE, COMMERCIAL FISH. COM'N v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API