State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Carlson
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
To what extent may Alaska charge nonresident commercial fishermen higher license and permit fees than it charges residents? In order to comply with the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution, the differential between individual resident and nonresident permit fees must be substantially equal—but need not be precisely equal—to the contribution of each Alaska resident to fisheries management. Because in ordering the state to pay refunds to nonresidents who paid more than their fair contribution to Alaska’s fisheries budget the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wyoming v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burton v. Fountainhead Development, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- STATE, COMMERCIAL FISH. COM'N v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2008