Legal Opinion

D'Orio v. Jacobs

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1929No. 21741. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an action to recover $202.50, the purchase price of certain Advertoshare game boards, the price and purchase of which are admitted, but, as an affirmative defense, it is pleaded that the goods sold were devices for use and to be used for gambling or lottery purposes, for a gift enterprise or for games of chance in violation of the constitution and statutes of this state and certain ordinances of the city of Seattle; that therefore the sale and purchase was illegal and void and the purchase price is not in law recoverable.

The plaintiff had judgment below for the full amount demanded,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DanzWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Society Theatre v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. Wong TookWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. TurlingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Dwyer & Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Globe-DemocratSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Schillberg v. BarnettWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. Schillberg v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Boatwright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Johnson v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API