Hall v. Great Northern Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Montana
At Law. Action by Cassie E. Hall and another against the Great Northern Railway Company. On motion to remand to the state court.
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
This is a motion to remand. Plaintiffs are citizens and residents of Canada, and defendant is a citizen and resident of Minnesota, a corporation and common carrier owning and operating a railway in and through the county of Montana wherein the suit was commenced.
Plaintiffs contend that against their objections this court has -no jurisdiction on removal, citing Mahopoulus v. Railway Co. (C. C.) 167 Fed. 169; Kamenicky v. Printing Co. (C. C.) 188 Fed. 400; Sagara v. Railway Co. (C. C.) 189 Fed. 222. Defendant contends to the contrary, citing Barlow v. Railway Co. (C.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Mahopoulus v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Oil & Gas Ventures-First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. KungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Matarazzo v. HustisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1919
- Bradley v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1951
- Enger v. Northern Finance CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1929
- Ostrom v. EdisonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.