Legal Opinion

CYNTHIA N. WASHINGTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2016No. 14-CV-653PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

A District of Columbia statutory provision, D.C.Code § 51-119(f) (2012 Repl.), provides that when an employer “makes an award of back pay” to a claimant, the employer must withhold from the award an amount equal to any unemployment benefits the claimant received during the period covered by the back pay award. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure the 'solvency of the District Unemployment Fund by recovering benefits the employee received as a substitute for the back pay. The chief question before us in this appeal is whether this statutory withholding…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. ANTOINETTE BOLZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Darian McKinney v. DCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
  3. In re: K.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Richard Bartel v. Bank of America Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Cleary v. ClearyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API