Legal Opinion
In re: K.G.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 15, 2018No. 17-FS-1106PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On further consideration of the court’s October 8, 2017, judgment that reversed the trial court order detaining appellant, remanded the case for further proceedings, and stated that an opinion would follow and it appearing that the mandate previously issued, it is
ORDERED, sua sponte, that the Clerk shall recall the mandate and issue the attached opinion explaining the court’s October 8,2017, judgment.
Easterly, Associate Judge:
Under our juvenile delinquency system, the District of Columbia recognizes that children, because of their cognitive and emotional immaturity, should not be treated…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dolan v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Wheeler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. MELVERN REIDDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Hively v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- In re D.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- In re N.H.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- United States v. James BumphusDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020