Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. Gillette
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 2017No. 2016AP002267-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*113¶ 1.
2Per curiam
The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Adam A. Gillette have filed a stipulation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12 that Attorney Gillette's license to practice law in Wisconsin should be suspended for a period of 60 days, as discipline reciprocal to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Minnesota.1 After reviewing the matter, we approve the stipulation and impose the stipulated reciprocal discipline. Although the stipulation did not expressly request that we impose the other forms of discipline imposed by the Supreme Court of Minnesota, we also follow our practice of…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against MoreeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against HookerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Adam Andrew GILLETTE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0328352Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Adam Andrew GILLETTE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0328352Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
4Cited by5 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Stoltman (In Re Stoltman)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Nicole Lynn BeranWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Nicole Lynn BeranWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Nicole Lynn BeranWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023