Legal Opinion

Rogers Realty, Inc. v. Smith

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 2003No. 98,507PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Judge.

[ 1 The parties are realtors. Plaintiff Rogers Realty, Inc. sued Defendants Jean Lyall Smith and Mary Louise Smith for interfering with the listing agreement and thus depriving it of a sales commission. Defendants moved to dismiss the lawsuit claiming that the matter should be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice of the National Association of Realtors®. The trial court treated the Motion to Dismiss as a Motion for Summary Judgment, found that there were no material facts in controversy and that Defendants were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jorgensen Realty, Inc. v. BoxColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Elbadramany v. StanleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lane v. UrgitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Seattle, Inc. v. Yates, Wood & MacDonald, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Lane v. UrgitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. Lane v. UrgitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. Rogers Realty, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API