Legal Opinion
Lane v. Urgitus
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 23, 2006No. 06SA49Published
1Opinion of the Court
145 P.3d 672 (2006)
Robert B. LANE, d/b/a Lane Realty Company, Plaintiff,
v.
Ronald J. URGITUS, Richard M. Calhoun, and CB Richard Ellis, Inc., Defendants.
No. 06SA49.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
October 23, 2006.
Frascona, Joiner, Goodman and Greenstein, P.C. Matthew B. Osofsky, G. Roger Bock, Oliver E. Frascona, Boulder, Colorado, Attorneys for Plaintiff.
Silver & Deboskey, P.C. Joe L. Silver, Martin D. Beier, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Defendants.
Rothgerber Johnson & Lyons LLP, Richard K. Clark, Craig R. Welling Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Amici Curiae National Association of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Goodson v. American Standard Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- BRW, Inc. v. Dufficy & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Archangel Diamond Corp. v. LukoilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.