Orion Insurance v. United Technologies Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HUYETT, District Judge.
By an Order dated July 31, 1979, we granted third-party defendant Carson Helicopter, Inc.’s motion to dismiss, which we treated as a motion for summary judgment. This memorandum states the reasons for that Order.
On March 21,1979, we permitted defendant United Technologies Corporation (“UTC”) to join Carson Helicopters, Inc. (“Carson”) as a third-party defendant. Gehring v. United Technologies Corp., C.A. No. 78-2972 (E.D.Pa., March 21, 1979). Carson has now moved, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), to dismiss the third-party complaint filed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Cooper Stevedoring Co. v. Fritz Kopke, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carcaise v. Cemex, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002