Legal Opinion
Carcaise v. Cemex, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 23, 2002No. Civil Action 01-859, 02-1240PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CAIAZZA, Chief United States Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons stated below, Industrial Contracting and Erecting, Inc.’s Motion to Consolidate the above-captioned cases (see Doc. 18 in Civil Action No. 01-859 and Doc. 4 in Civil Action No. 02-1240) will be denied, 1 as will its Request for a Hearing regarding the same (see Doc. 24 in Civil Action No. 01-859).
David J. Carcaise (“Mr.Carcaise”) and his wife (collectively “the Carcaises”) filed the first of the above-referenced cases on May 15, 2001, asserting subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. See generally Compl.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Tsarnas v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bergman v. City of Atlantic CityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Kelly v. Carborundum Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Angelo v. Thomson International, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Boudreaux v. State of TexasDo not docket in this case. Case is consolidated under (3:20-cv-223).District Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
- Christin Heaps v. Delaware Valley Regional High School Board of Education, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- Desio v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- Devillier v. THE STATE OF TEXASDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.