Legal Opinion
Il Kim v. Pollution Control Hearings Board
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 24, 2003No. 27804-9-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Morgan, J. —
Joo Il Kim and Keum Ja Kim appeal a ruling that they must have a permit to use well water for their commercial nursery. Based on RCW 90.44.050, we reverse.
Since 1990, the Earns have owned real property on N.W. Central Valley Road in Poulsbo. The property is the site of their home and their business, a commercial nursery called Central Valley Greenhouse. The nursery’s components are a greenhouse, a display area of less than a half acre, and parking spaces for eight cars.
The property is served by a well that was drilled in about 1965. The Kims take groundwater from the well for both…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Kim v. Pollution Control Hearing Bd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2005
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2009