Legal Opinion
Kim v. Pollution Control Hearing Bd.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 24, 2003No. 27804-9-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
61 P.3d 1211 (2003)
115 Wash.App. 157
Joo Il and Keum Ja KIM, Appellants,
v.
POLLUTION CONTROL HEARING BOARD, et al, Respondents.
No. 27804-9-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
January 24, 2003.
James Charles Tracy, Poulsbo, WA, for Appellants.
Thomas J. Young, Attorney General's Office, Ecology Division, Olympia, WA, for Respondents.
MORGAN, J.
Joo Il Kim and Keum Ja Kim appeal a ruling that they must have a permit to use well water for their commercial nursery. Based on RCW 90.44.050, we reverse.
Since 1990, the Kims have owned real property on N.W. Central Valley Road in Poulsbo. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2005
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2009