Legal Opinion

McKendrick v. Western Zinc Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1913No. Sac. No. 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Shasta County refusing to vacate a judgment and open a default. J. E. Barber, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

At the time of the hearing of this cause in Bank a motion of the respondents to amend the record on appeal by inserting therein a copy of the verification of the complaint, showing that it was duly verified, was granted, but the clerk failed to enter the order in the minutes. The verification must now be deemed a part of the record. This makes it necessary to determine questions which were not considered by the court in Department in its decision upon which a rehearing was granted.

The appeal is from an order.of the trial court denying the motion to vacate the judgment against and open the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Ligare v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Spencer v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Douglas8 v. Pacific Mail Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Piggly-Wiggly Georgia Co. v. May Investing Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. People v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Porter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. Indian Hills Holdings, LLC v. FryeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  5. Pierce v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API