Pierce v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
LANGDON, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the above order in so far as it prohibits the lower court from striking from the great register the names of electors who were not served and did not appear in the superior court proceeding. I dissent from the order because of its manifest failure to grant the full appropriate relief to which petitioners are entitled, namely, the prohibition of all further proceedings in the court below.
This is an application for an alternative writ of prohibition, to restrain the respondent superior court from making contemplated orders, the effect of which…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- American Land Co. v. ZeissSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Moyer v. PeabodySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Security Savings Bank v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.