City of Middleton v. Hennen
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.
Defendants appeal from circuit court judgments affirming municipal court traffic convictions. In each case, the defendant sought a circuit court "transcript review" of his or her municipal court conviction under § 800.14(5), STATS. The circuit court affirmed the convictions in written decisions without holding hearings or requesting briefs from the parties. Defendants claim a violation of their due process right "to be heard" because they did not have the opportunity to brief or argue their appeals in the circuit court. We conclude that § 800.14 does not require the circuit court to hold a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BorrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Jackson v. CoffeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Brandt v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Brandt v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- La Crosse Lutheran Hospital v. La Crosse CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SmytheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SmytheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Village of Menomonee Falls v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- City of Pewaukee v. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004