Legal Opinion

City of Middleton v. Hennen

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 7, 1996No. 95-3054, 95-3055, 95-3399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.

Defendants appeal from circuit court judgments affirming municipal court traffic convictions. In each case, the defendant sought a circuit court "transcript review" of his or her municipal court conviction under § 800.14(5), STATS. The circuit court affirmed the convictions in written decisions without holding hearings or requesting briefs from the parties. Defendants claim a violation of their due process right "to be heard" because they did not have the opportunity to brief or argue their appeals in the circuit court. We conclude that § 800.14 does not require the circuit court to hold a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BorrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. CoffeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Brandt v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  4. Brandt v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. La Crosse Lutheran Hospital v. La Crosse CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SmytheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. SmytheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Village of Menomonee Falls v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. City of Pewaukee v. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API