Legal Opinion

Ream v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1897No. 9165PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error ,to the district court for Cumiug county. Tried below before Evans, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.

The plaintiff in error William C. Ream was by information in the district court for Thurston county, in separate counts, charged (1) with stealing cattle; (2) with receiving the cattle in question, knowing them to have been stolen. A change of venue was allowed on motion of the plaintiff in error, and the cause removed to Cuming county, where a trial was had resulting in an acquittal as to the charge of cattle stealing and a conviction upon the charge of receiving said cattle knowing them to have been stolen, and which is presented for review by means of the petition in error in this case.

Coun…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Omaha Real Estate & Trust Co. v. KragscowNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Tomer v. DensmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley R. R. v. WhalenNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Levi v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Granger v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Norton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  3. In re LoomisNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Lovejoy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. In re AlgoeNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API