Legal Opinion

Granger v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1897No. 9364PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Sheridan county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.

This was a prosecution for stealing a cow. The principal ground urged for a reversal is that the act of the legislature of 1895, under which the defendant was con*353victed, is unconstitutional and void. The act in question is chapter 77, Laws, 1895 (Criminal Code, sec. 117a), and reads as follows:

“An act to punish cattle stealing and to punish persons receiving or buying stolen cattle, and to punish all persons harboring or concealing cattle thieves.
“Be it Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Nebraska:
“Section 1. If any person shall steal any cow, steer, bull, or calf, of any value, or if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ArnoldNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Brown v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Brown v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Shaffer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Ream v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. In re AlgoeNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Globe Loan & Trust Co. v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API