Commonwealth v. Pringle
Mercer County Court of Quarter Sessions
1Opinion of the Court
Acker, J.,
The issue for determination in this case is whether a criminal information is so defective that a defendant must be discharged, due to the failure of the committing magistrate to follow the provision of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure in the preparation and filing of a transcript following a hearing. The answer, under the facts of this case, must be yes.
Defendant was charged with a violation of The Vehicle Code of April 29, 1959, P. L. 58, sec. 1027, subsec. a, 75 PS §1027.1 Attached to the “information” was a “criminal complaint”, blank as to its first page. Printed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Francis v. CorletoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. DingmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Commonwealth v. BrennanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 85 v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. KeeganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.