Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pringle

Mercer County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided February 21, 1968No. 100Published

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, J.,

The issue for determination in this case is whether a criminal information is so defective that a defendant must be discharged, due to the failure of the committing magistrate to follow the provision of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure in the preparation and filing of a transcript following a hearing. The answer, under the facts of this case, must be yes.

Defendant was charged with a violation of The Vehicle Code of April 29, 1959, P. L. 58, sec. 1027, subsec. a, 75 PS §1027.1 Attached to the “information” was a “criminal complaint”, blank as to its first page. Printed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Francis v. CorletoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. DingmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Commonwealth v. BrennanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 85 v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. KeeganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API