Legal Opinion

Inland Real Estate Corp. v. Village of Palatine

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 6, 1986No. 84—2536, 84—2866 consPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pincham

Defendant Ferndale Heights Utility Company (Ferndale) was a privately owned and operated utility company until the village of Palatine (Palatine) purchased it in 1981. Thereafter, plaintiffs, former customers of Ferndale, brought this class action to challenge the rates for water, sewer, tap-on and meter services set by Palatine after the purchase. The trial court found, inter alia, that the water rate of $6.23 per 1,000 gallons set by Palatine was unreasonable and discriminated against plaintiffs and set a water rate of $3.45 per 1,000 gallons.

In this appeal, plaintiffs contend that (1) the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corp. v. DeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Springfield Gas & Electric Co. v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Wagner v. City of Rock IslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Austin View Civic Ass'n v. City of Palos HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Motz v. Central National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Platt v. Town of TorreyUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Walker v. Brigham CityUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Inland Real Estate Corp. v. Village of PalatineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Platt v. Town of TorreyUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Walker v. Brigham CityUtah Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API