Legal Opinion

Calcaterra v. Montana Resources

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2001No. 00-729PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶1 Karen Calcaterra (Karen) filed a Rule 60(b)(6), M.R.Civ.P., motion for reconsideration and relief from a judgment of dismissal, based on a change in the law, in the Second Judicial District Court, Silver Bow County. The motion was deemed denied after the District Court failed to timely rule on it, and Karen appeals. We affirm.

¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the denial of Karen’s Rule 60(b)(6), M.R.Civ.P., motion was an abuse of discretion.

BACKGROUND

¶3 The underlying case was before us in Calcaterra v. Montana Resources, 1998 MT 187, 289 Mont. 424, 962 P.2d 590. Karen, the surviving…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fiscus v. Beartooth Electric Cooperative, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Carlson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Sherner v. Conoco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bahm v. SouthworthMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Karlen v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Essex Insurance v. Moose's Saloon, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Renville v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Stockman Bank of Montana v. Mon-Kota, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Renville v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Dorwart v. CarawayMontana Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API