In re Waters Drain Drainage District
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs, Arath iy Inc., and Bomarko, Inc., appeal by leave granted1 a circuit court order affirming a probate court order awarding defendant, the Kent County Drain Commissioner, attorney fees under MCL 280.158 and compensating board of review members. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendant undertook to make improvements to the Waters Drain and apportioned the cost of such improvements to property owners located in the Waters Drain Special Assessment District in accordance with the *216Drain Code, MCL 280.1 et seq. Plaintiffs owned land…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Klooster v. City of CharlevoixMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thomas M Cooley Law School v. Doe 1Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Lima Twp v. BatesonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ronnisch Construction Group, Inc. v. Lofts on the Nine, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Calvert Bail Bond Agency, LLC v. St Clair CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Great Lakes Shores, Inc. v. BartleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.