Legal Opinion

Calvert Bail Bond Agency, LLC v. St Clair County

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2016No. Docket 324824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.

Plaintiff is in the business of becoming surety on bonds for compensation in criminal cases in the state of Michigan. Plaintiff, pursuant to MCL 600.4835, sought a return of the sums it paid to defendant on bond-forfeiture judgments. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs claims and held that the exclusive remedy for the return of such funds was through MCL 765.28. Because the Legislature’s amendment of MCL 765.28 did not establish that it was to be the exclusive remedy in these instances, we reverse and remand.

The parties do not dispute the underlying facts. Plaintiff became surety for many…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kevin Krohn v. Home-Owners Ins CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Tkachik v. MandevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Hanson v. Mecosta County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sovereign v. SovereignMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. In re Waters Drain Drainage DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carthan v. Snyder (In re Flint Water Cases)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  2. Longmire v. McCullickDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API