State v. Vinton
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
This opinion supersedes our prior opinion issued October 25, 1985, which is hereby withdrawn.
McFADDEN, Judge Pro Tem.
Carl and Marion Vinton, husband and wife, were tried by a jury and convicted of “manufacturing” marijuana in violation of I.C. § 37-2732(a)(1)(B). 1 Carl Vinton was sentenced to an indeterminate term of three years and fined $2,500. However, the court retained jurisdiction for 120 days so Mr. Vinton could be evaluated for probation candidacy. Marion Vinton was sentenced to an indeterminate term of two years and fined $2,500. Her sentence was suspended,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. CampbellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. FenleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. FilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Beatrice Martinez Delgado and Gilbert Hernandez Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RandlesIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HolcombIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. BurnsideIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. GarzaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. RoyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.