Legal Opinion
Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 17, 1981No. Civ. A. 74-122PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
SHAPIRO, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Post-trial motions in this antitrust litigation are before the court pursuant to a limited remand order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Defendants Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. (“KACC”) and Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. (“KACSI”) move for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial, following a jury verdict in favor of Columbia Metal Culvert Co., Inc. (“Columbia”) 1 finding KACC and KACSI in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Greer v. SpockSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Dunn v. HOVICCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Lanza v. PorettiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.