Legal Opinion

Deemer Lumber Co. v. Hamilton

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1951No. 37939PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arrington, C.

Hartness Hamilton was killed while working in the course of his employment with the Deemer Lumber Company on January 30, 1950. At the time of his death he was 23 years of age, unmarried, and left surviving him his mother, father, two brothers and a sister. Mr. and Mrs. Sidney Hamilton, his parents, filed claims as dependents under the Mississippi Workmen’s Compensation Law. The Deemer Lumber Company and its insurance carrier, T. H. Mastín and Company, denied liability on the grounds that the parents were not dependents under the provisions of the Compensation Law and that the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Lucedale Veneer Co. v. RogersMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Elm Springs Canning Co. v. SullinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. WarnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Herron Lumber Company v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Big" 2" Engine Rebuilders v. FreemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Central Electric Power Ass'n v. HicksMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  3. McCluskey v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  4. General Elec. Co. v. McKinnonMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Brookhaven Steam Laundry v. WattsMississippi Supreme Court · 1952

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API