United States v. Northern Securities Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
On petition by Edward H. Harriman and Winslow S. Pierce, as trustees, and the Oregon Short Pine Railroad, Company, for leave to intervene after decree. The Continental Securities Company was permitted to intervene for the purpose of objecting to the petition.
1Opinion of the Court
THAYER, Circuit Judge.
This is an application by Edward B. Harriman and Winslow S. Pierce and the Oregon Short Line Railroad Company for leave to intervene pro interesse suo in the case of the United States v. The Northern Securities Company and others. The case in which they seek to intervene has already passed to a final decree, and the decree has been affirmed lately by the Supreme Court of the United States. 24 Sup. Ct. 436, 48 L. Ed.-.
The petitioners recite as the grounds of their application that Harri-man and Pierce, as trustees for the Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, are the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Root v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Williams v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- In the Matters of HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States Casualty Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. Columbia Gas & Electric CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1939
- Defense Plant Corporation v. United States Barge LinesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.