Apel v. Katz
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 11.] APEL ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. KATZ ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Apel v. Katz,
1998-Ohio-420.] Real property—Interpretation of scope of the reservation of the right to keep and maintain a roadway easement. (No. 97-641—Submitted March 24, 1998—Decided August 19, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 68294. __________________ {¶ 1} This appeal revolves around a dispute over the scope of an easement on a parcel of land, and the often acrimonious relationship of the owners of the two properties…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Northpointe Properties v. Charter One BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Beavers v. PNC Bank, Natl. Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Favors v. BurkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Hemmelgarn v. Huelskamp & Sons, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Striff v. Luke Med. Practitioners, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.