Legal Opinion

Apel v. Katz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1998No. 1997-0641PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 11.] APEL ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. KATZ ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Apel v. Katz,

1998-Ohio-420.] Real property—Interpretation of scope of the reservation of the right to keep and maintain a roadway easement. (No. 97-641—Submitted March 24, 1998—Decided August 19, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 68294. __________________ {¶ 1} This appeal revolves around a dispute over the scope of an easement on a parcel of land, and the often acrimonious relationship of the owners of the two properties…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Northpointe Properties v. Charter One BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Beavers v. PNC Bank, Natl. Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Favors v. BurkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Hemmelgarn v. Huelskamp & Sons, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Striff v. Luke Med. Practitioners, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API