Legal Opinion

Rodrigue v. Letendre

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 23, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.

Plaintiffs by complaint sought injunctive relief against defendants for obstruction of a right of way claimed by plaintiffs. Defendants by counterclaim likewise sought injunctive relief against plaintiffs based upon alleged encroachment of plaintiffs’ building on land of defendants. Pursuant to M. R. C. P. Rule 39 (c) the justice below submitted issues of fact to a jury for special findings and adopted these findings, in ordering judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants have appealed from the final judgment and from the denial of a motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hunter v. TotmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  2. Gross v. MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  3. Richardson v. LalumiereSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  4. Harrison v. WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  5. Kimball v. ClarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pendexter v. PendexterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Boynton v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  3. State v. TerroniSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  4. Morgan v. PaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  5. Supruniuk v. PetriwSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API