Legal Opinion

Pendexter v. Pendexter

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 7, 1976PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

By this action appellant seeks reversal of an order of the Superior Court requiring him to pay his former wife an additional $10.00 per week per child for the support of fheir minor children.

We deny the appeal.

Appellant Robert Pendexter and appellee Elizabeth Pendexter were divorced in May 1970. Custody of the four minor children was awarded to Mrs. Pendexter. Mr. Pen-dexter was ordered to make support payments of $18.75 per week per child. In November 1970 Mrs. Pendexter moved for and was granted an increase in support payments of $1.25 per week per child.

In October 1974 she…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Womble v. WombleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  3. Boerger v. American General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Hunter v. TotmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  5. Luques v. LuquesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Harmon v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. DabkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Osier v. OsierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Wood v. WoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. Fournier v. FournierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API