Legal Opinion

Christian v. Harleysville Worcester Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 6, 2007No. AC 27913Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The plaintiff, James Christian, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his application to compel arbitration as to the defendant, Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company. The dis-positive issue on appeal is whether the defendant’s insurance policy covered the dealer plate attached to the motorcycle involved in the plaintiffs accident.1 We conclude that under the circumstances of this case and the unambiguous language of the insurance policy, the plate was not covered. Thus, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts, as found by the court,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Ceci v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Success Centers, Inc. v. Huntington Learning Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Hottle v. BDO Seidman, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. State v. Phillip Morris, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API