Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commercial Credit Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1922No. 12780PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Trover; from city court of Macon — Judge Gunn. July 1, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. Where a defendant in an action of trover admits in his plea or answer his possession of the property at the time of the action, under an adverse claim of title or right of possession, it is not necessary for the plaintiff to prove a demand and refusal or any other conversion of the property. Civil Code (1910), § 4483; Muse v. Wright, 103 Ga. 783, 784 (30 S. E. 662); Moore v. Ramsey, 144 Ga. 118 (86 S. E. 219); Young v. Durham, 15 Ga. App. 678 (5) (84 S. E. 165); Pearson v. Jones, 18 Ga. App. 448 (89 S. E. 536); Collins v. Hilton, 27 Ga. App. 439 (108 S. E. 824).

2. Where property has been…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hays v. Jordan & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Mashburn & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Moultrie Repair Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Young v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Elder v. Woodruff Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Securities Trust Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. King v. LoebCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Ellis, McKinnon & Brown v. HoppsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. C. I. T. Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Standard Motors Finance Co. v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API